Re: [FT] Kra'Vak Design Test (for dsicussion)

A very long time ago (2 weeks *is* long on the 'net), Steven Arrowsmith
wrote:

> All this system did was equal out the Kra'Vak point spread. Instead of
2
> to 1 ratio, now its 1 to 1. In More Thrust the example Kra'Vak Heavy
> Cruiser had a point value of 310, this was 1.302 times higher than the
> Human Heavy Cruiser listed at 238 in Full Thrust. This was the point
value
> I was trying to keep..

Why? The Va'Dok design in MT was usually capable of defeating more than
400 pts of Human ships, so why stick to the old ratio between human and
Kra'Vak points costs? The list suggestion (Schoon's? I don't remember
:-(
) of multiplying Kra'Vak points values with 1.5 for the MT rules was
pretty accurate, so unless you downgrade the new Kra'Vak a *lot* you'll
get rather inaccurate point costs if you try to stay close to the values
from MT...

Regards,

Oerjan Ohlson
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com

"Life is like a sewer.
  What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
- Hen3ry