Re: [FT][SG][DS] Canada, the US Civil War II, and the structure of the NAC (really long)

>
>>Alaska and Hawaii - direct entry into NAC 'cause of geographic
isolation
>>(tho' you might say that Alaska is subsumed into the "Canada" region,
by
>>virtue of location)
>
>
>Hmm...

OK - the Alaskans wouldn't like that one bit.  They go in
independently...

>
>
>No doubt about that, I've been there... but does FCT control Texas on
Terra?
>Or just colonies?  I mean, are the states of California and Texas
>independent of the NAC?
>

Yes they are, but later.  Remember, my commentary was covering the NAC
at
its beginnings, before it gets South America and before FCT breaks
off...

>Perhaps, for the NW region, something completely silly like Pacifica?
Of
>course, Idaho doesn't have a Pacific shoreline, but I still think it
should
>be a part of the NW region. Hm, Pacifica sounds kind of cool actually.
>
>-Buji
>

Sure!  Why not!  :-)