Prev: Re: [FT] IF Ship Design Next: Re: [DS] camo schemes for vehicles

RE: [FT] IF Ship Design

From: "Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 17:00:32 +1100
Subject: RE: [FT] IF Ship Design

It's either 2 subpacs OR 2 class-1 beams.  That's probably the extra
mass.  
I'm using hand calculations for this.

'Neath Southern Skies
http://users.mcmedia.com.au/~denian/
*****
T'was brillig, & the slithy toves,
Did gyre & gimle in the wabe.
All mimsy were the borogroves,
And mome raths outgrabe.
		       - Lewis Carroll "Through the Looking Glass".

-----Original Message-----
From:	Laserlight [SMTP:laserlight@cwix.com]
> IF Tulwar class Heavy Destroyer (DDH)
> Displacement: 5000 tonnes
> Cost: 176 MUcr
> Hull Type: Weak (Integrity 10)
> Crew:  13 officer, 37 ratings (Crew Factor 3)
> Drive systems: Main Drive rating 6
> Sensors suite: Standard sensors; 1 fire control system
> Armament: 
> 2 SMR(er) (FP/F/FS)
> 2 SMR(std) (FP/F/FS)
> 2 Submunition Packs (F) or 2 Class-1 batteries
> 1 Class-2 battery (FP/F/FS)
> Defenses: 2 Point Defense Systems
Exactly.  However, Jared's spreadsheet says this is 52 mass stuffed into
a
50 mass hull.  Delete the Sub Packs?


Prev: Re: [FT] IF Ship Design Next: Re: [DS] camo schemes for vehicles