RE: [FT] Keeping "Old" RGs
From: "Tim Jones" <Tim.Jones@S...>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 08:25:28 -0000
Subject: RE: [FT] Keeping "Old" RGs
Like the snake that swallows its own tail were back here...
>This is the best idea I have heard yet.... Simple, no intensive
>changes
>
>But what about rerolls? Hate to harp on it but all the major
>armaments of all the races should have the chance for a catastrophic
>hit.
>
IMHO the double damage per class is the RG version of penetrating damage
(aka rerolls) so its already factored in. Catastophic damage is a
different
mechanic factored on the number of SSD damage tracks nuked in a single
turn.
I think its a mistake to try to overload RG's with beam based mechanics.
We've already gone full circle lets stop now.
-= tim jones =-