Prev: Re: [FT] What was WRONG with Railguns?? Next: Re: [fh ot] Re: [GZG][FH] Planet types (was Re: Locations of Stars)

Re: [FT] What was WRONG with Railguns??

From: Steven Arrowsmith <arrowjr@u...>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 15:43:59 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [FT] What was WRONG with Railguns??

On Fri, 4 Dec 1998, Matthew Seidl wrote:

> 
> Why do we have to find a "right" way to do rail guns, and not just
> find multiple "new weapon systems".  I would think that a lot of
> places with campaign games would LIKE to have multiple, balenced
> weapons to research, or to give out to enemy ships.
> 
> -=- Matthew L. Seidl		email: seidl@cs.colorado.edu		
   =-=
<heavy sniped>

Matthew,

We are trying to find the "right - kra'vak" railguns. This is not to say
that all railguns MUST work this way. In our world Humans have there own
Gauss Cannons, So Nobody HAS to play with these Railgun rules as all
railguns..

Steven (the biggest pain in this thread)

			       Steven Arrowsmith
			  www.public.usit.net/arrowjr
			     steven@arrowsmith.net
			      dredd@quake.usit.net
________________________________________________________________________
_______

		    I Would Rather live a Lie, Thinking I Can.
			 Than know The Truth That I Can't
________________________________________________________________________
_______

Prev: Re: [FT] What was WRONG with Railguns?? Next: Re: [fh ot] Re: [GZG][FH] Planet types (was Re: Locations of Stars)