RE: [FT] K'V Armour Vs. Weapons
From: Steven Arrowsmith <arrowjr@u...>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 14:49:26 -0500 (EST)
Subject: RE: [FT] K'V Armour Vs. Weapons
On Thu, 3 Dec 1998, Tim Jones wrote:
> I thought of something like this too but the problem is it
> potentially unfixes rail guns in that there is an advantage
> to just use class 1's against KV integral armor.
>
> In your example 1 class 3 (6 MASS) does a min 1 point againt
> level 2 armor. 6 class 1's (6 MASS) does a min 6 points against
> level 2 armor. This gives you no incentive to mount Class 3.
>
>
> -= tim jones =-
>
Tim,
D'oh .. Ok, lets drop the first one, and look at doing 1 point
of damage to armoured hulls on a roll of 6 only - instead of a reroll.
SA
Steven Arrowsmith
www.public.usit.net/arrowjr
steven@arrowsmith.net
dredd@quake.usit.net
________________________________________________________________________
_______
I Would Rather live a Lie, Thinking I Can.
Than know The Truth That I Can't
________________________________________________________________________
_______