RE: [FT] Kra'Vak Changes
From: "jim clem" <travmind@h...>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 1998 07:04:27 PST
Subject: RE: [FT] Kra'Vak Changes
Heck, the engineering in ST is insulting to all us engineers.
JimC B.S.E and Forensic Engineer
----Original Message Follows----
From: Thomas Barclay <Thomas.Barclay@sofkin.ca>
To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 23:05:50 -0500
Subject: RE: [FT] Kra'Vak Changes
Reply-To: gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Steven spake thusly upon matters weighty:
> Correct me if I am mistaken, but Human Beam batteries are a
development or
> offshoot of particle accelerators? Regardless of what you call them -
> Phaser, lasers, particle project cannons, fusion cannons - they are
all
> energy weapons designed to eat armour, hull and anything eles that
gets in
> their way. If Kra'Vak armour acts like energy shields, when hit by
Human
> beams, whos to say, that they don't also act like nuclear dampers, or
have
> other special features..
Or maybe they have the dreaded "Structural Integrity Field" (a ST PSB
field designed to hold together ships that would otherwise apparently
fly apart... mighty scary engineering - it seems obvious to me why no
engineers at starfleet academy wear iron rings....).
Tom.
> Steven
>
>
>
/************************************************
Thomas Barclay
Voice: (613) 831-2018 x 4009
Fax: (613) 831-8255
"C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes
it harder, but when you do, it blows away your whole leg."
-Bjarne Stroustrup
**************************************************/
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com