RE: [FT] FB Kra'Vak
From: Steven Arrowsmith <arrowjr@u...>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 08:22:04 -0500 (EST)
Subject: RE: [FT] FB Kra'Vak
On Tue, 1 Dec 1998, Tim Jones wrote:
<kra'snip>
> You may well be right about the armor rating
> 34 boxes does seem excessive.
>
> Also on web site you are using completely different RG mechanic
> and general weapon costings than the latest 'schoon' system, isn't
> this more than slightly modified? (namely RG cost and SG mass/cost).
>
> tim jones
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
>
Tim,
We are looking at the armour rules now, I have noticed that this system
could be misused and the armour boxes could get out of hand real quick..
SA
Steven Arrowsmith
www.public.usit.net/arrowjr
steven@arrowsmith.net
dredd@quake.usit.net
________________________________________________________________________
_______
I Would Rather live a Lie, Thinking I Can.
Than know The Truth That I Can't
________________________________________________________________________
_______