Prev: Re: [FT] Railgun Goals | Next: RE: [FT] Kra'Vak Design Test (for dsicussion) |

Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 09:37:53 -0500 (EST)

Subject: Re: [FT] Kra'Vak Design Test (for dsicussion)

```
On Sun, 29 Nov 1998, Sean Bayan Schoonmaker wrote:
> Kra'Vak Ship Design Procedure
>
Sean,
Heres a test using your system - 70 Mass heavy Cruiser..
Hull 72 points
Hull Integrity 22 mass 32 boxes 66 points
FTL 7 mass 14 points
Main Drive - 6 Thrust 22 mass 66 points
Subtotal 51 mass 146 points
Class 3 railguns x2 8 mass 40 points
Class 2 railguns x2 4 mass 20 points
Scatterguns x4 4 mass 40 points
Fire Cons x2 2 mass 8 points
Armour 6 boxes 3 mass 6 points
Subtotal 21 mass 114 points
Grand Total 70 mass 260 points
** Note had to drop 2 Class 2 railguns.
Human Heavy Cruiser points from Fleet Book:
NAC 261
NSL 271
FSE 293
ESU 240, 262
All this system did was equal out the Kra'Vak point spread. Instead of 2
to 1 ratio, now its 1 to 1. In More Thrust the example Kra'Vak Heavy
Cruiser had a point value of 310, this was 1.302 times higher than the
Human Heavy Cruiser listed at 238 in Full Thrust. This was the point
value
I was trying to keep..
Steven
Steven Arrowsmith
www.public.usit.net/arrowjr
steven@arrowsmith.net
dredd@quake.usit.net
________________________________________________________________________
_______
I Would Rather live a Lie, Thinking I Can.
Than know The Truth That I Can't
________________________________________________________________________
_______
```

Prev: Re: [FT] Railgun Goals | Next: RE: [FT] Kra'Vak Design Test (for dsicussion) |