Re: FT: ICEBREAKER

On Mon, 9 Nov 1998, Ground Zero Games wrote:

well, i wanted canonical, i got canonical (of course, the esteemed - er,
eminent, er, highly respected - mr tuffley is not exactly impartial on
this matter ;-).

> >On Sun, 8 Nov 1998, John Leary wrote:
> >> Tron wrote:
> >> > Seeing that the list appears to have dried up ....
> >> J) 1) Just wondering how many will stay with FTII due to the
eligant
> >>	   simplicity of the rules.
> >i'll drink to that!
> >i've not actually seen ft1.3 (as i will continue to call it :-) ie
the
> >fleet book, but from what i've read i'm wary of it.
<snip expressions of fear and other symptoms of ignorance>

> Tom - I think you'll find your fears are groundless if you take a look
at
> the FB. If you still want to use all-beam fleets, or any other style
of
> fleet you want, you can.

grand. the only thing that still worries me a bit is salvo missiles;
however, i think that given some practice (and thorough reading of the
utterances of the wiser listizens) i could get used to them. play nac,
deploy fighter screens, jink like the dickens.

Tom