Re: STL travel
From: Thomas Anderson <thomas.anderson@u...>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 08:44:44 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: STL travel
On Thu, 29 Oct 1998, Nyrath the nearly wise wrote:
> Thomas Anderson wrote:
> > also a teeny bit like larry niven's ubiquitous gravity polariser -
now
> > there's a drive! i think the idea was you could flip the sign of the
force
> > between you and a big mass, and so use it to generate lift.
>
> Well, actually, that turns out not to be the case.
> Niven's gravity polarizer had much the same limitations
> of a parachute.
> You could go any direction, as long as the direction
> was "down".
>
> It would convert your motion relative to a gravity well
> into waste heat. So you could hover or fall slowely,
> but you could not rise.
aha. i think he may have changed it over the course of his books - not a
totally unheard-of maneuever. in 'protector', pssthpok (or whatever his
name was) reasons that since his polariser is still working, he has
freedom of movement in the solar system. i took this to mean he could
fly
anywhere, including up a well. i may well have misinterpreted this; your
version certainly sounds more logical. it also sounds a bit like
cavorite,
but that's another issue ...
Tom