Re: [FT extra rules]
From: John and Roxanne Leary <realjtl@s...>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1998 18:59:34 -0700
Subject: Re: [FT extra rules]
Richard Slattery wrote:
...Snip...JTL
> > IMHO, if you want to fidget like this, it's much better to adjust
> > "effective range to target", e.g. small fast ships are counted to be
4"
> > farther away than they really are.
>
> Hmm... I like this.. range bracket modifiers are far more easily
> scaled... and it's possible to give benefits from having very
> manueverable ships under beam or torpedo fire... i.e. ships with
> thrust of 6 or more 4" range change, 8 or more, 6".... hmmmm.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Richard Slattery richard@mgkc.demon.co.uk
> Teeth extracted by the latest methodists.
> Hong Kong dental advertisement
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, I can see your point that this can be used for a number of
additional changes:
In SFB terms:
Legendary captain.
Legendary Gunnery officer.
Ect.
This concept could also lead to four ships armed with the same
weapons having 4 different ranges for one player to control.
It is all a matter of how much 'detail' of 'accuracy' or PSB
you are willing to put up with.
While what I suggested may be somewhat crude, it has the
virtue of simplicity. :-)
Bye for now.
John L.