Prev: Re: Planetary insurgencies..was Planetary defenses Next: Re: erm... power armour

Re: The Kra'Vak

From: Los <los@c...>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 09:44:18 -0700
Subject: Re: The Kra'Vak

John and Roxanne Leary wrote:

> Los,
>      My (self-appointed) Clan is the Kra'vak_D'rk.   I like James
> Moores notes/background on his web site. (J. Moore Online: Full
> Thrust)
> I have placed the D'rk as a subclan of one of the major clans listed.
> (Which one?  I have not yet decided.)
>

Oh Oh Oh! Please send me the link!

> Notes on the D'rk:
> 1) They are a second or third line clan bucking for promotion.
> 2) They are (somewhat) heritics as they are interested in alien
>    techonology.  (A very bad thing!)
>

However it supports my "scavenger theory of technolgy acquuisition.

> 3) They do not have political pull to get the full compliment of
>    weapons that a ship class would normally carry.  (I.E. Escorts
>    mostly mount class one, Cruisers class two, and Capitals class
>    three (but in more limited numbers than a normal kra'Vak ship.)
> 4) Ships are often acquired thru salvage and repair of battle
>    damaged ships of other clans.   (Mostly thru the low prestige
>    job of escorting convoys for pay.)
>    (This allows me to build some interesting ships of truly
>    unusual shapes.)
> 5) Clan policy does not allow the firing of more than 2 scatterguns
>    on single enemy ship. (per turn)

I like it. I thought you could only fire one scatter gun per turn
anyway?

Los

Prev: Re: Planetary insurgencies..was Planetary defenses Next: Re: erm... power armour