Re: Splitting the Mailing List Suggestion

At the risk of wasting more bandwidth on this, I agree completely with
the
assessment below. NO to two lists.

Eric Ackermann

>On Tue, 29 Sep 1998, Magnus Alexandersson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 28 Sep 1998, Hedglin, Nils A wrote:
>>
>> <scissors>
>> >
>> > So, what do people think about starting a seperate DSII/Stargrunt
list?
>> >
>>
>NO. Besides, haven't we just had this discussion a couple of months
ago?
>
>Reasons NOT to split the list:
>
>1. Background discussions - the GZG 'offical' universe, or any other,
>including historical discussions - these usually slide back and forth
>between DS/SG & FT focus, or neither. So which list gets the background
>stuff?
>
>2. Personally, I don't yet play FT - just DS & SG. But I'm interested,
I
>own the FT & MT books, and someday intend to actually start a fleet.
>There's lots of people on the list who actually DO play all three games
-
>why should we have to subscribe to two seperate lists?
>
>3. Crossposting bites. Big time. Know how annoying it is to get the
same
>message on a couple of different newgroups? (I'm talking of Usenet, but
>the principle applies.) Things like Con & website announcements, etc
would
>all have to be crossposted...
>
>My $0.02 - take it or leave it...
>
>Brian (burger00@camosun.bc.ca)
>http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Nebula/9774 -- my gaming & misc
website.