RE: Planetary defenses
From: Noah Doyle <nvdoyle@m...>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 22:07:26 -0500
Subject: RE: Planetary defenses
kwalsh writes:
>the idea of using a Trident sub as an SDB is almost appealing, you
>could mount space combat nukes instead of ICBM's.
>yeah I know thats a major stretch, but its the same basic concept
Not that much of a stretch. Given an efficient, powerful spacedrive
(whatever that might be...) a sub is pretty much a ready-made
spacecraft.
Sealed environment, lots of space to work with. If you rip out the
missiles of an Ohio-class SSBN, or, Lenin forbid, a Typhoon-class, you'd
have a lot of space to play with. A Typhoon, puttering around with a
bellyful of SMs or MT missiles would be scary. In the Traveller milieu,
space missiles were even smaller than modern SLBMs - about 7 cubic
meters,
as I remember from TNE.
Actually, even a low-efficiency spacedrive would work well on a sub -
ion
drives, maybe.
Noah