Re: [FT universe]
From: laserlight <laserlight@m...>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 07:56:50 -0400
Subject: Re: [FT universe]
----------
Samuel Penn replied to
>> Beth Fulton
>
> > For instance if you look at the costings
> > of just one of the privately funded dutch explorations (during the
age
of
> > sail), which went looking for tradeable items (for instance the
spices
from
> > Indonesia etc), you'll find that it comes out at an amount greater
than
> > what NASA spent on the Voyager missions.
>
> Slight difference in that the Dutch were funding sailing expeditions
> at a time when sailing was very common. 'All' they were proposing was
> going a bit further, using tried and trusted technology.
>
> Currently, to start any big scale space expeditions requires cutting
> edge technology (assuming you want to go colonise somewhere), which
> hasn't really been tried and tested, It not only requires lots of
> money, it requires spending that money on things most people don't
> really understand.
Yes, but currently we're not colonizing anywhere either. So our steps
will
be something like:
Let's build a better space station. Let's build a lunar base. Let's go
visit Mars. Let's build a space station and send that to Mars. Let's
build a lunar base--on Mars! (etc.)
By the time we get around to actually colonizing, we will be using
tried
& true. For a very interesting book that goes into a proposal on the
steps, see _ The Millennial Project _ by Marshall Savage. I have some
reservations about his proposed politico-economic systems but the basic
path seems reasonable.