Re: GZG Future (was Re: Odd FT Idea)
From: "Richard Slattery" <richard@m...>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1998 00:33:02 +0000
Subject: Re: GZG Future (was Re: Odd FT Idea)
On 4 Jul 98 at 23:31, Sabmason@aol.com wrote:
> As a counterpoint, wouldn't the Atlantic become much less of a
> barrier,
> compared to interplanetary travel, let alone interstellar? And I
> agree that it is more interesting to keep them for gaming purposes
> ('There will always be a Second Armored Cavalry. If I am wrong, may
> God stike me down.'). It may be more like the USA, with distinct
> regional cultures, and an over-arching government. I also have to
> keep reminding myself that it's a constitutional/parliamentarian
> monarchy, not a republic with strong democratic traditions.
> As far as the USA goes, at least where I am, the distinction
> between
> smaller cities in the same area is not great - small towns even
> less. There tends to be a 'regional' identity, with some differing
> spots sticking out. This is not accurate across the entire country,
> mind you. Large concentrations of people tend to have their own
> identities, often quite different from the surrounding areas.
>
> But the problem of the 'North' (USA/UK/Canada) vs. 'South'
> (Central &
> South America) sticks in my head. It wasn't addressed much by the
> official history, and I doubt that the NAC could quietly absorb that
> distinct of a culture. Any thoughts?
>
> Noah
>
Well, I made the point that even neighbouring cities in the UK, which
have a very short travel time between them keep very specific
identities, so why would that change, QED, why would American and
Brit identities merge.
Dunno about your North/South America point, out of my realm of
semi informed speculation ;)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Richard Slattery richard@mgkc.demon.co.uk
At present there are such goings-on that everything is at a standstill.
Sir Boyle Roche
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~