Prev: Re: Looking for US Army minis Next: Re: Communication and Travel

Re: OT, was Re: combat spoilers for "Movements of Fire and Shadow"

From: Doug_Evans/CSN/UNEBR@U...
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 1998 08:54:14 -0500
Subject: Re: OT, was Re: combat spoilers for "Movements of Fire and Shadow"

Well, as the the high ranking officers of EF are generals, I always
assumed
that the armies won the various interservice rivalries, absorbing the
navies and air forces of the constituent countries, and used whatever
terminology they felt like. ;->=

'Cruiser? That's what I used to pick up chicks on the main drag back
home.
Destroyer, now THAT'S impressive nomenclature for a piece of FM!'

Sorry, Jons, I promise any further comment, obviously getting way OT,
will
go to the B5 news group. Come to think of it, I see if Dejanews can
search
up an answer from JMS hisself.

The_Beast

Prev: Re: Looking for US Army minis Next: Re: Communication and Travel