RE: SG actions rule clarification
From: jatkins6@i... (John Atkinson)
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 1998 15:22:05 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: RE: SG actions rule clarification
You wrote:
>No. If a Power Armour trooper (or any other trooper) could fire weapon
A in one >action then weapon B in another action then what is to stop
them firing weapon >A in both activations? It's surely easier for the
trooper to fire the same weapon >twice than to aim and fire two
different weapons. And as firing the same >weapon twice is banned by
the rules than I guess firing two different ones is as >well.
Hrm. . . then to make sense to issue both a MLP and a APW, you've gotta
give the MLPs limited ammo. Which sorta makes sense. The other way is
to read the paragraphs on P. 30 to imply that both can be fired at the
same target at the same time--possible with computor-control, but not
likely. On the other hand, if you can incorporate underbarrel GLs into
a 'fire small arms' action, why not triggering a pack of rockets?
>> How about one with APW and SLAM/1?
>
>There's no such thing as a SLAM/1. SLAMs come in sizes 3 to 5 only.
What is that on top of those NSL PA troops? I'm not talking the little
bitty dual rocket packs, I'm talking the BIG ones.
John