RE: Mines 8 (!)
From: John Skelly <canjns@c...>
Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 12:36:33 -0400
Subject: RE: Mines 8 (!)
Now that I think about it having lanes marked was SOP for our mine
fields. Obviously it wouldn't be marked until right before it was
needed. If I remember correctly there was usually a dog leg in it.
Is this something not practised by Americans?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jatkins6@ix.netcom.com [SMTP:jatkins6@ix.netcom.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 15, 1998 10:27 AM
> To: FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk
> Subject: RE: Mines 8 (!)
>
> You wrote:
>
> <re: Lanes>
>
> >What about a provision to have them only known to the layer (he said
> >layer)?
>
> Kinda difficult. Have to remember, safety first. Unless a lane is
> clearly marked, you will have people thinking they are in the lane,
> only to find out wrong when they trip a tripwire and send a bounding
> fragmentation[1] mine up to wipe out their platoon.
>
> John M. Atkinson
> [1]AKA "Bouncing Betty" US version has lethal radius of 27 meters,
> danger radius of 183 meters.