Prev: RE: Mines 8 (!) Next: RE: Mines 6

RE: Mines 8 (!)

From: John Skelly <canjns@c...>
Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 10:28:48 -0400
Subject: RE: Mines 8 (!)

Sorry about that post.	I was a little tired when I wrote it.

To clarify: when laying minefields sometimes hidden paths are placed
through them.  I can't remember if that was standard or not.  They would
allow you to go through them rather than bloking yourself in.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Skelly [SMTP:canjns@can.sas.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 15, 1998 8:21 AM
> To:	'FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk'
> Subject:	RE: Mines 8 (!)
> 
> What about a provision to have them only known to the layer (he said
> layer)?  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	jatkins6@ix.netcom.com [SMTP:jatkins6@ix.netcom.com]
> > Sent:	Friday, May 15, 1998 1:01 AM
> > To: FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk
> > Subject:	Mines 8 (!)
> > 
> > OK, last one tonite.
> > 
> > Lanes.  Lanes will come in useful for launching counterattacks, etc.
> 
> > must be marked CLEARLY so that no dumb infantryman get confused and 
> > runs into the wrong place.	I advise using counters marked with a
> >=< 
> > sort of bridge indicator to show a vehicle lane, and a simple >-< to
> 
> > show a foot-only lane.  Note that you can place a Manpack
> scatterable 
> > mine system in a lane to prevent enemy use if necessary.
> > 
> > Questions, comments, concerns, flames, death threats?
> > 
> > John M. Atkinson

Prev: RE: Mines 8 (!) Next: RE: Mines 6