Re: Ship Naming Convention
From: Shld Wulf <ShldWulf@a...>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1998 06:24:50 EDT
Subject: Re: Ship Naming Convention
In a message dated 4/6/98 6:22:38 PM Mountain Daylight Time,
agoodall@sympatico.ca writes:
<< On Mon, 06 Apr 1998 17:55:30 +0000, Rob Paul
<rpaul@worf.molbiol.ox.ac.uk>
wrote:
>Not sufficiently "hard as nails", apparently. It sounded to me as
>if the Navy should be teaching a bit more history to its recruits.
Then
>again, I do think we have plenty of better names and historic ships to
>honour before starting a "Duke" (not even Duchy) class.
What was the ship's name?
And you'd think that if ANYONE had a right to complain about their ship
names
it would have been the crew of the Flower class destroyers during WWII.
I
mean
Gladiolus (an actual name) sure strikes fear in MY heart, how about
you?
Allan Goodall agoodall@sympatico.ca>>
Remembering a certain freind of mines most feared ship design, (The
system
escapes me it was about 16 years ago, though the name/ship keeps
appearing in
his fiction and he keeps threatining a re-design :) a Mercenary Cruiser
by the
name of:
(As translated from an alien language of the game)
"Little yellow Flower, repose on a field of Crimson"
As I recall, ship and commander took out a fair number of Heavy Cruisers
and
at least one Light Battleship as I recall. Guess who commanded the BB(L)
:)
Randy