Prev: Re: Some FT background stuff (guidelines for writers) Next: Re: [OFFICIAL] Some FT background stuff (guidelines for writers)

Re: Superdrone

From: Jerry Han <jhan@c...>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 02:05:53 -0500
Subject: Re: Superdrone

ROBERTSON,Brendan wrote:
> 
> Don't forget that 3 PDAFs could potentially wipe out the entire
squadron
> in one round.
> Let's see...
> 3 PDAFs=9 points, 6 superdrones=200 points.
> Looks like a fair tradeoff to me.
> Also - Fleet carrier of 1200 points against balanced fleet = dead
fleet
> carrier, with the potential of losing every drone.
> 

Actually, that points up one of the problems with the FT fighter system;
you can make fighters faster, fight ships better, fight fighters better,
and do all other sorts of neat things, but you can't make them more
survival through better jamming equipment or better armor.

Hmm, I don't remember now... does the heavy fighter option increase
survivability against anti-fighter weapons?

If superdrones were designed and built, one of the things they should
definately be is more survivable.  (Either active or passive
defenses...)

J.

-- 
Jerry Han -  CANOE Canada - jhan@canoe.ca - http://www.idigital.net/jhan
  ***** Visit the Canadian Online Explorer! => http://www.canoe.ca *****
The opinions expressed are mine, and not necessarily those of CANOE
Canada.
	 "Is there no escape from the words that plague me so?"


Prev: Re: Some FT background stuff (guidelines for writers) Next: Re: [OFFICIAL] Some FT background stuff (guidelines for writers)