Re: Fighter Jocks.
From: Jerry Han <jhan@c...>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 23:42:56 -0500
Subject: Re: Fighter Jocks.
Allan Goodall wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Feb 1998 16:07:25 -0800, John Leary <realjtl@sj.bigger.net>
> wrote:
>
> >As far as the sonic boom vs WWI aircraft, I think it makes for
> >a great short story. The presumption that everything will
> >just fall apart as you go by in your jet or never regain control
> >due to the shock wave is a bit much.
>
> Ooooooh, no it's not! Until late in the war, no one knew how to pull
> out of a spin. It was assumed that a spin was fatal. What's more, it
> took very little to throw a WW1 fighter into a spin. In some, just
> stalling the plane or turning too tightly would do it. The wake of a
> twin engine fighter travelling supersonic should do it, too.
There's a short story on this topic that was published years ago. I
read it in one of those short story sci-fi anthologies: Space Fighter
3000
or something like that. (8-)
Also remember that WW1 fighters were fairly fragile compared to modern
counterparts. What was VNE for a Camel? 100knts? Granted, she didn't
stall until 40 or 50 or so, but still... (8-)
J.
--
Jerry Han - CANOE Canada - jhan@canoe.ca - http://www.idigital.net/jhan
***** Visit the Canadian Online Explorer! => http://www.canoe.ca *****
The opinions expressed are mine, and not necessarily those of CANOE
Canada.
"Is there no escape from the words that plague me so?"