Prev: Re: SG II House Rules - longish post Next: Re: Worried about GenCon.

Re: SG II House Rules - longish post

From: Barry Cadwgan <bcadwgan@f...>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 1998 17:18:44 +1100
Subject: Re: SG II House Rules - longish post

Thomas Barclay wrote:
> 
> 
> > Funny but I always think the side with the most money have better
armor,
> > regardless of troop quality.
> 
> Just as what comprised a knight in some time periods had less to do
> with heredity or social standing than it did with money (which
> probably had to do with the other two in many ways). For example, in

Also, I would imagine, the _time_ available and good teachers. 
Experience, training and decent equipment/armour pre-gunpowder would be
a killer (literally) combination.  

_Then_ add a warhorse, squire and men at arms and a large dose of sheer
bloodymindedness..

-- 
Barry Cadwgan ( BCADWGAN@FL.NET.AU )
http://www.users.fl.net.au/~bcadwgan/homepage.htm
"The end does not justify the means.  
 The end is the sum of the means,
 as the road travelled determines the destination." 
Valijon Starbringer (Hellflower Trilogy, Eluki bes Shahar)

Prev: Re: SG II House Rules - longish post Next: Re: Worried about GenCon.