Prev: Re: Another Starfire plug, was Re: Strategic Full Thrust Next: Re: FTGZG mailing list

Re: Strategic Full Thrust

From: Mikko Kurki-Suonio <maxxon@s...>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 14:42:47 +0200 (EET)
Subject: Re: Strategic Full Thrust

On Sat, 10 Jan 1998, Michael Sandy wrote:

> If the initial production is negligible for the first
> 100 or 200 years then a 100-fold or 1000-fold increase
> in population could justify the colonies expense.
> That is a much greater timespan than most campaigns!

I agree with your reasonings. Personally, I've always thought that 
setting newly colonized wolrds to produce military units for you is at 
least a bit silly, and strongly reminds me of Empire (deluxe or not).

I can understand taking over existing production facilities, especially 
of raw materials, but building new ones is a bit too much...

It is, perhaps, because campaigns often ignore the real importance of 
forward bases: Supply and logistics.

-- 
maxxon@swob.dna.fi (Mikko Kurki-Suonio) 	  | A pig who doesn't
fly
+358 50 5596411 GSM +358 9 80926 78/FAX 81/Voice  | is just an ordinary
pig.
Maininkitie 8A8 02320 ESPOO FINLAND | Hate me?	  |	     - Porco
Rosso
http://www.swob.dna.fi/~maxxon/     | hateme.html |

Prev: Re: Another Starfire plug, was Re: Strategic Full Thrust Next: Re: FTGZG mailing list