Re: Big guns on small ships
From: Mikko Kurki-Suonio <maxxon@s...>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 16:40:32 +0200 (EET)
Subject: Re: Big guns on small ships
On Tue, 16 Dec 1997, Tim Jones wrote:
> I'd be interested as an aside which ships these were.
A couple of coastal monitors, mostly used for gunnery training,
and possibly shore bombardment. Certainly never saw any surface combat
worthy of note. They weren't called coastal for nothing either,
I don't think they were all that seaworthy. Slow as hell, certainly.
A couple of monitors saw combat in WWI, if you count bombarding
a holed-up-in-river-delta german cruiser.
> However it was not 'that' common and a lot of British Navy
> Cruisers in the early years were about 8 inch.
That, OTOH, is almost entirely due to the Naval treaties of the era.
Anything with guns larger than 8 inches was classified as a capital,
and restricted under treaty.
> I don't quite understand you here, are we talking about WWII or FT?
I agree... you shouldn't think too strongly in terms of parallels.
Look at the present situation: Destroyer and cruiser are used almost
interchangeably, more an indication of function than size.
--
maxxon@swob.dna.fi (Mikko Kurki-Suonio) | A pig who doesn't
fly
+358 50 5596411 GSM +358 9 80926 78/FAX 81/Voice | is just an ordinary
pig.
Maininkitie 8A8 02320 ESPOO FINLAND | Hate me? | - Porco
Rosso
http://www.swob.dna.fi/~maxxon/ | hateme.html |