Prev: Re: Vector Rules Next: Re: Vector Rules / Inertial dampers

RE: Vector Rules / Inertial dampers

From: Tim Jones <Tim.Jones@S...>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 07:54:22 +0100
Subject: RE: Vector Rules / Inertial dampers

On Tuesday, October 07, 1997 8:34 PM, Stuart Ford [SMTP:stuart@mag.com]
wrote:
Status: RO

>> only drawback is that the further you are away from the point of
rotation,
> the more inertia you will have to deal with.	Captains take note...
make no
> surprise high speed maneuvers, lest your forward gunners become salsa.
> 
>

Adding more faggots to the Burning Heretic of Vector Movement

What about inertial dampers then? The ships in FT must have them
otherwise
the accelerations they make would liquify the crew. I don't know if
anyone
has worked out the G force of a Thrust of +3 but I imagine its got to
be pretty high and if we take Star Trek or Honor Harrington then we're 
in the region of 500g. You have to have inertial dampers or you're
salsa.

If you have inertial dampers why can't you use them to remove your
rotational inertia?

sincerely
tim jones
--
The stars are matter, We're matter, But it doesn't matter.



Prev: Re: Vector Rules Next: Re: Vector Rules / Inertial dampers