Re: Wet Thrust/Full Steam Playtest
From: Rob Paul <rpaul@w...>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 23:00:35 -0400
Subject: Re: Wet Thrust/Full Steam Playtest
Here's some stuff from Conway's on pre-dreadnought armour:
The Fujis and their cousins the Royal Sovereigns had compound armour, ie
a
steel face on a wrought iron backing.
The other Japanese predreads (except Mikasa) and their cousins the
Majestics
had Nickel Steel armour.
Mikasa had Krupp cemented armour.
The Majestic-derived Japanese ships had a different armour layout to the
Fujis- although all 6 ships had the armour deck at the level of the top
of
the belt, the later ships had the edge of the deck slopingdown to meet
the
_lower_ edge of the belt, effectively making a second differently angled
belt inside the true belt.
On the effectiveness of different types of armour:
HMS Centurion (2nd class Battleship): belt 12" compound
HMS Renown (2nd class Battleship): belt 8" nickel steel _but giving
equivalent protection_
HMS Canopus (1st class Battleship ("close to being 2nd class"): belt 6"
Krupp Cemented "equivalent to 8" of Harvey"
It appears from this that the conversion is approximately:
3" Krupp = 4" Harvey/Nickel Steel = 6" compound
I vaguely recall "Devil at the Helm" giving credit of 1" of iron for
each 6"
of timber backing.
Ihope this is of some use
cheers
Rob
"
Rob Paul
Dept. of Zoology
University of Oxford
South Parks Road
Oxford
(01865) 271124
rpaul@worf.molbiol.ox.ac.uk
Once again, villainy is rotting meat before the maggots of justice!
"