Prev: Re: AI in FT (was Re: Be gentle...) Next: PDAF

Re: AI in FT (was Re: Be gentle...)

From: Sutherland <charles@n...>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 17:31:16 -0400
Subject: Re: AI in FT (was Re: Be gentle...)


>In the same vein, how many conscripts would willingly set foot on a
capital
>ship, given the amount of damage sustained and/or life expectancy of
the
>ships in FT?
>Makes a fighter look a whole lot safer by comparison. At least the
fighter
>pilot can die with the illusion of direct control over his own fate...
not
>so for the poor shmucks that exploded when the ship decompressed, that
were
>burned down at their weapons stations, or met their demise otherwise
aboard
>a capital ship.

How many do it now?
Several 100,000 just in our Navy I believe.
I work in communications for the Air Force.  I sit in a big building
with
C3 equipment that just screams BIG A## TARGET all over it.  

					War Sucks, Get a helmet
					That Chuk Guy

Prev: Re: AI in FT (was Re: Be gentle...) Next: PDAF