Prev: RE: Close Assault and Scenario (Stargrunt) Next: RE: Close Assault and Scenario (Stargrunt)

RE: Close Assault and Scenario (Stargrunt)

From: Gerald McVicker <gmcvicke@w...>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 15:31:37 -0400
Subject: RE: Close Assault and Scenario (Stargrunt)

>On a tangent, risking changing the thrust of the responses from the
>question above to this rhetorical question (and being bombarded by
>hate mail and flames), the reaction I've seen ("Why would you do
>that?!  Fire at them from afar!!") is a product of the American
>fascination with Hardware, the concept that SciFi is about nifty toys
>and not people, a combination of both, or something completely
>different.

Here Here!  That was my point.	It has been done, it will be done in the
future and the desparation required to close assault an armored vehicle
must be great.	The problem is...its not modeled in the system.  Easy
enough to rectify, make one.

> I don't want anybody to take this personnally - I don't
>even know whose message I'm responding to.  It's just that I wonder
>how even asking about simulating such a risky and dangerous maneuver,
>which has happened and will keep happening, brings up such a "Don't!"
>response...
>
>Too much rambling already.  And I've gotten a lot of help from the
>list.	It's just that I find it rather difficult to understand...
>
>Alfredo (small skull) Lorente... ;-)
>---------------------
>Alfredo Lorente
>Minneapolis, MN
>alfredo@bitstream.net

Jerry McVicker

"Don't worry soldier, weapons will be available in a moment."

I buy my gaming supplies at....

Blackwind and Raddix Gaming
http://www.imagixx.net/~bnrgames
bnrgames@imagixx.net

Prev: RE: Close Assault and Scenario (Stargrunt) Next: RE: Close Assault and Scenario (Stargrunt)