Re: Weapon Variants for SGII
From: Mikko Kurki-Suonio <maxxon@s...>
Date: Mon, 19 May 1997 07:51:07 -0400
Subject: Re: Weapon Variants for SGII
On Mon, 19 May 1997, Brendan Pratt wrote:
> I disagree with the danger element - most scifi flamers would use a
> binary fuel that was only dangerous after mixing
So what happens when the tanks are ruptured in a <insert mega-death
weapon here> blast?
> than a 20th century firearm,
Modern rounds DO cook off occasionally. It's just that they're not very
dangerous without a barrel and bolt. But HE rounds are dangerous because
their lethality is due to the explosive, not their kinetic energy.
Likewise, flamer fuel could fo up in a fireball if the system is damaged
in combat.
The chance exists. Whether it's small enough to ignore is a matter of
personal preference.
--
maxxon@swob.dna.fi (Mikko Kurki-Suonio) | A pig who doesn't
fly
+358 50 5596411 GSM +358 9 80926 78/FAX 81/Voice | is just an ordinary
pig.
Maininkitie 8A8 02320 ESPOO FINLAND | Hate me? | - Porco
Rosso
http://www.swob.dna.fi/~maxxon/ | hateme.html |