Re: Missile Defense for stations
From: Eric Fialkowski <ericski@m...>
Date: Tue, 13 May 1997 01:35:37 -0400
Subject: Re: Missile Defense for stations
At 12:46 AM 5/13/97 -0400, you wrote:
>I believe the the base being a stationary platform should be given a
>bonus as a stable weapons platform.
So do I.
>All beam weapons mounted gain a additional 4 inches in each range band.
>
I added an extra 6 inches. If calculations are right, this gives AA
bateries the same range as missiles.
>
>Additionally all beam batteries may fire at missiles to there full
range
>but require a 6 to kill the target. When firing in this mode one beam
>gets 1D6. Its harder to track with a bigger beam as the range shortens
>(AA batteries can't burn out).
>
Also, I give them twice the boarding parties. We haven't had a chance
to
really play test this, but we like the feel. Now that school is two
days
from being done, we should have the chance to test it out.
+++++++++++++++
+------------+ +----------------+
+ Eric Fialkowski +
+ http://netnow.micron.net/~ericski +
+ +
+----------------+ +------------+
+++++++++++++++