Prev: Bye for now Next: Mildly depressing

Re: Bigger--not always better

From: Robert Hendricks <RHENDRICKS@n...>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 10:39:25 -0500
Subject: Re: Bigger--not always better


In responce to:
>>> "Rutherford, Michael" <MRutherf@nibucorp.telstra.com.au> 03/25/97
04:59PM >>> 
I don't know if this has been suggested but here goes...

Given the current ship "breakpoints" (ie escort, cruiser, capital), it
would seem appropriate to make use of them in a solution to the battery
arc problem. If, for example, the number of arcs on larger beams for the
smaller ship classes is restricted.

ie an escort could have "A" batts (restricted to 1 arc), "B" batts
(restricted to 2 arcs) and "C" batts (3 arcs), a cruiser could have "A"
batts (restricted to 2 arcs), "B" batts (3 arcs) and "C" batts (3 arcs)
and a capital could have "A" batts (3 arcs), "B" batts (3 arcs) and "C"
batts (3 arcs)

This would mean that most of the current diagrams could be used with a
minor recalc on the points.

Michael "Wargh" Rutherfurd

_______________

This is exactly the system I use in local campaign and it works very
well.  I was going to
suggest it on this list, but I see I am too slow.

Robert C. Hendricks
rhendricks@novell.com


Prev: Bye for now Next: Mildly depressing