Re: Trek/SFB conversions
From: Joachim Heck - SunSoft <jheck@E...>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 15:52:58 -0500
Subject: Re: Trek/SFB conversions
Allan Goodall writes:
@:) The problem with Star Trek is that the characters never change,
@:) never evolve. Everything must end the episode at status quo.
To be fair, although they haven't reached B5's level, the DS9
writers have been a lot better about this. In fact, given that they
haven't got the self-imposed apoptosis of B5, I think they're doing
about as well as can be expected. Much less pleasing is Voyager.
Here is a perfect opportunity to plan the large-scale plot of the show
in advance and move everything slowly towards a conclusion, and they
completely blew it.
DS9 has a continuing plot involving the Dominion and the insidious
shapeshifters thereof. The Federation is (apparently) riddled with
spies, and the Klingon empire was actually being run by a shapeshifter
until recently. Also DS9 doesn't dance around the religious issue as
much as typical ST. A few weeks ago, Sisko turned into a prophet and
vision junkie who was willing to die rather than lose the
ever-clarifing ability to understand the future.
So it's not B5 - where a character vanishing is usually NOT (gasp!)
the sign of a contract deal falling through, but it keeps me
interested. It's better than nothing.
-joachim