Re: Realistic movement thoughts
From: Samuel Penn <sam@b...>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 12:36:36 -0500
Subject: Re: Realistic movement thoughts
In message <32E3A8E4.145F@csd.uwm.edu> you wrote:
> Personally I think that the realistic rules should be an
optional
> rule. It would make the game much more appealing to new players if
the
> normal "semi-vector" rules were still there. I just taught my 11
year
> old cousin how to play, and I think that the trying to grasp concepts
> like vector movement might drive him MAD.
I had great problems trying to grasp the FT movement rules
when I first started playing. It just seemed so unnatural,
and I kept planning tactics in terms of 'real' movement for
several games.
I still prefer realistic movement to FT movement, but then
my brain has been hardwired into Hard SF from an early age!
--
Be seeing you, ARM not Intel.
Sam. Acorn not Microsoft.