Re: Dirtside II question

On Wed, 8 Jan 1997, Oerjan Ohlson wrote:

> 
> This is what that rule implies, yes. However, if you look at the list
of 
> system sizes (don't remember which side it is, but directly after the 
> example design of the size 4 hover tank) that list specifies the GSM/L
as 
> 2 cap.points and the GSM/H as 4 cap.points. I think that this is an 
> oversight - ie, I agree with your interpretation - yet those who claim

> that a GSM/H uses 4 cap.points no matter how it is mounted has rather 
> strong support in the rules too.
> 

I think GMS is a fairly portable system. It does not requir much space. 
After all GMS/L can be carried by infantry, much like today's weapon. So

I still think GMS/H should be only size class 2

************************************************************************
*
*"To be or not to be that is the question."			       
*
*To be is infinite better then to be in the limbo flowing around...    
*
*So.....			 Get a life... :)		       
*
*Chun-Kai Wang a.k.a. Kevin, Zelt, and Zilvra Argith		       
*
************************************************************************
*