Re: Why big ships are too good...
From: Adam Delafield <A.Delafield@b...>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 05:02:50 -0500
Subject: Re: Why big ships are too good...
Date sent: 10-DEC-1996 10:00:39
>The assumption we were running on is that total hull points is not
>representative of the entire hull, merely the amount of damage required
>to damage its usefulness in terms of vital systems and such and
actually
>there are structural elements left behind even if all damage points are
>gone. A second method would be to design superships in a starbase type
>arrangement, with each module connected to all the others... So a three
>module ships would look like a triangle (with limiting arcs for each
module)
>--Binhan
I once designed a SSD like this. It had three sections. A core that
contained the Hanger Deck and some point defence, and two 'banks'
that contained weapons. I never got round to using it though.
+-------------------------------------+--------------------+
| Adam Delafield, I.T. Officer | Bolton Institute, |
| #include "witty_saying" | Eagle Tower, |
| E-mail : ad4@Bolton.ac.uk | College Way, |
| Phone : +44 1204 528851 (ext 3163) | Bolton, UK. |
| Fax : +44 1204 399074 | BL3 5AE. |
+-------------------------------------+--------------------+