Re: FT III, BIg ships and such.
From: thomas.granvold@E... (Tom Granvold)
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 12:38:08 -0500
Subject: Re: FT III, BIg ships and such.
On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Chad Taylor wrote:
> I have a lot of misgivings about FTIII at the moment. This sounds
rather
> like a GW thing. There may (to some) be a problem with one small
section
> of the game that isn't exactly balanced. GW then turns around and
changes
> the entire system, forcing us to buy the new game. That is happening
at
> the moment to Epic. A game that is very good with only a few
problems, so
> lets redesign it from the ground up. FTIII for the moment just sounds
> like that. I realize that I am about to get flamed in the worst way
for
> comparing GZG to GW in this way, but I am getting tired of this kind
of
> nonsense. FT is just fine the way it is, in fact it is great! All FT
> could possibly need (IMHO) "might" be a few suggestions on how to
balance
> out some of the things that a few people feel are unbalanced (keeping
in
> mind that not everybody feels they are).
I agree, and IF this were the case I might not buy FTIII.
> IMHO I feel that a third
> expansion (kind of a "bit more thrust" or whatever) would be much
better.
> I would like to see a few suggestions to balance the "problems", maybe
> some new tech systems, a few more alien races, and maybe some campaign
> rules.
An excellent idea Chad.
Enjoy,
Tom Granvold <thomas.granvold@eng.sun.com>