Prev: Re: FT III alternative rules Next: Re: Minimum Range

Re: Armored Missiles

From: Mike Miserendino <phddms1@c...>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 09:07:50 -0500
Subject: Re: Armored Missiles

Robert A. Crawford wrote:
>	I've always viewed FT missiles as salvoes of missiles, not
>individuals. They seem _huge_ to me, and making them swarms makes up
>for that. It also explains why they do so much damage.

Seems like large missiles would make sense, since the missiles can cover
extensive distances they would likely require larger propulsion systems
and
support.

Mike Miserendino

Prev: Re: FT III alternative rules Next: Re: Minimum Range