Re: Re[2]: Beam Weapons
From: JAMES BUTLER <JAMESBUTLER@w...>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 11:21:07 -0500
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Beam Weapons
At 09:15 AM 11/29/96 +0000, you wrote:
>Secondly, we have recognised the problem with beam weapons inbalance
and
>the latest idea is to distinguish between "casemate" weapons (i.e.
single
>arc) and "turreted" (i.e. 2 or 3 arc):
>
> MASS
>C battery (turretted only) 1
>B battery (casemate) 2
>B battery (turret) 4
>A battery (casemate) 4
>A battery (turret) 8
>
>
>What do you all think??
>
I think this is extremely cool (we've been using half mass for
single arc weapons for a while now) but have a question. With a turreted
A-bat at 8 mass, are you going to increase the mass available to capital
ships?
>As fas a "fix" for FT II is concerned, I think the simplicity of the A
>battery is MASS 4 is fine, and would recommend its adoption as a house
>rule. That's probably as "official" as you're going to get.
>
>
>Mike Elliott, GZG
>
Good enough for me. Thanks.
James
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
___
|[|]|
|[|]|
/|[|]|\ _______ __ // //
_ _ /==|[|]|==\(_______)/ \__[__]__[__]__MMMMMMMMMM\
[_|_|\%%===[|]====(_______)| |===================HHHHHH\
[_|_| %%===[|]====(_______)| |=X=X=X==X=X=X======HHHHHHH]
[_|_| %%==========(_______)\__/ }C=K@ WWWWWWWWWW/
[_|_|/
}C=K@
|_____||__________||_________||____________||___________|
Main Bridge/ Fuel/ Weapons/ Scanners/
Drive Quarters Jump Drive Ship's Boats Spinal Mount
Battlecruiser INTREPID, CORMORANT-class
Captain James L. Butler III, Commanding
JAMESBUTLER@worldnet.att.net