Re: Looking for a new home.

In message <009AB51B.175B4B4A.378@basil.acs.bolton.ac.uk> Adam Delafield
writes:
> 
> The powers that be (not me this time, the Usenet people) were very
resistant
> to r.g.m.warhammer simply because it was specific to Games Workshop. A
gzg
> group would meet as much, if not more resistance.

If I recall, the objection was to r.g.m.games-workshop, rather than
r.g.m.warhammer. One can play a "warhammer"-universe (or whatever you 
call it) game with any rules or figures. I don't read r.g.m.wh but I
recall a somewhat subversive campaign on r.g.m where a list of 
GW-esque figures was maintained.
 
> >I doubt that r.g.m.sf would
> >succeed in a voting process since it would essentially leave r.g.m.m
empty.
> 
> It might also encourage more use of .m for painting tips etc, and keep
the
> 'for sale' posts in their place.

There should've been an r.g.m.marketplace.

-- 
David Brewer