Re: "Realistic" Systems Ideas
From: JAMES BUTLER <JAMESBUTLER@w...>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 23:45:54 -0500
Subject: Re: "Realistic" Systems Ideas
At 10:53 PM 10/30/96 +0000, you wrote:
>> There is room for abuse here though. I could mount enough
sandcasters to
>> put out a "4" cloud in any one of the port, starboard, and fore arcs.
I'd
>> be completely screened against enemy fire to get in close to your
fleet.
>
>It would be very difficult to put out a >3 cloud with a one caster per
>arc limit as Mark posted.
>
> Carl Black
A one caster per arc limit is illogical. The ship won't explode
if
we install two level two systems. A better solution would be to say that
because of dissipation it is impossible for a ship to generate a >3
cloud no
matter how many systems were active at the same time. Besides which, if
I
were relying on this system to protect me (no screens) then I would
definitely want backups. And if each system comes with only so many
effective uses, I might have ships (such as troop transports and/or
priority
transports and such) that I would want to have extra uses even if I
couldn't
use them (both systems) at the same time.
James
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
___
|[|]|
|[|]|
/|[|]|\ _______ __ // //
_ _ /==|[|]|==\(_______)/ \__[__]__[__]__MMMMMMMMMM\
[_|_|\%%===[|]====(_______)| |===================HHHHHH\
[_|_| %%===[|]====(_______)| |=X=X=X==X=X=X======HHHHHHH]
[_|_| %%==========(_______)\__/ }C=K@ WWWWWWWWWW/
[_|_|/
}C=K@
|_____||__________||_________||____________||___________|
Main Bridge/ Fuel/ Weapons/ Scanners/
Drive Quarters Jump Drive Ship's Boats Spinal Mount
Battlecruiser INTREPID, CORMORANT-class
Captain James L. Butler III, Commanding
JAMESBUTLER@worldnet.att.net