RE: FT3?
From: JAMES BUTLER <JAMESBUTLER@w...>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 1996 01:46:45 -0400
Subject: RE: FT3?
At 05:02 PM 9/24/96 +0000, you wrote:
>
The two fleets with carriers got badly mauled by the fleet armed
>soley with missiles and two fleets heavily armed with A's and AA's.
>(admittedly they were not realistic designs since the A's were two arc
>batteries, port and forward)
>
>--Binhan
>
I wondered if it would make sense to pay for two arcs for
batteries
and then declare that to be a 180 degree forward arc?
James
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
___
|[|]|
|[|]|
/|[|]|\ _______ __ // //
_ _ /==|[|]|==\(_______)/ \__[__]__[__]__MMMMMMMMMM\
[_|_|\%%===[|]====(_______)| |===================HHHHHH\
[_|_| %%===[|]====(_______)| |=X=X=X==X=X=X======HHHHHHH]
[_|_| %%==========(_______)\__/ }C=K@ WWWWWWWWWW/
[_|_|/
}C=K@
|_____||__________||_________||____________||___________|
Main Bridge/ Fuel/ Weapons/ Scanners/
Drive Quarters Jump Drive Ship's Boats Spinal Mount
Battlecruiser INTREPID, CORMORANT-class
Captain James L. Butler III, Commanding
JAMESBUTLER@worldnet.att.net