RE: stargrunt
From: SimonC@d... (Simon Campbell-Smith)
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 12:11:27 -0400
Subject: RE: stargrunt
With out getting political. Molotovs in Northern Ireland, Chianaman Sq.
China were cases of 'close assault against armour'. Stopping an MBT
would
be difficult however an APC/MICV is another ball game. Anti armour
genades or things into suspension. Did anybody remember in the termintor
movie the close assault scene where the humans used those charges to
take
out the tracked hunter killer. If thats not close assualt what is!
----------
From: FTGZG-L[SMTP:FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk]
Sent: 25 September 1996 14:49
To: FTGZG-L
Cc: A.Delafield
Subject: RE: stargrunt
Date sent: 25-SEP-1996 14:44:53
>I hope this is the right place to ask this, given this is mainly for
full
> thrust but:
This is the place.
>Does anyone know if Heavy Anti-material rifles are small arms vs AFVs?
(I
>hope yes otherwise they are better than MDC1s)
They are better than MDC1s (Any decent tech race can fit MDC2s anyway)
Some Weapons are better than others.
>Does anyone have any ideas about how to handle infantry close assault
vs
>armour?
If you close assault a tank in SG2, it will run you over and squish you.
What you can do is conduct firing from point blank range. (Does anyone
know of a real life example of close assault on a modern tank? I don't.)
>Thanks in advance
>Barry
+-------------------------------------+--------------------+
| Adam Delafield, I.T. Officer | Bolton Institute, |
| | Eagle Tower, |
| E-mail : ad4@Bolton.ac.uk | College Way, |
| Phone : +44 1204 528851 (ext 3163) | Bolton, UK. |
| Fax : +44 1204 399074 | BL3 5AE. |
+-------------------------------------+--------------------+