RE: TV SF's glorious past ;-)

>>  Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 10:24:18 +0000
>>  From: Phillip Atcliffe <P-ATCLIFFE@wpg.uwe.ac.uk>
>>  Subject: RE: TV SF's glorious past	;-) - Reply
...
>>  equipment from Monday's episode) are still very much theory.
Actually, the
>>  sub-launched fighter is the most feasible piece of equipment of the
lot, with the
>>  possible exception of the Mobiles. There have been sub-launched
aircraft since
>>  World War I! They just haven't been mounted on the front of the sub
up till now...

Sub-launched aircraft have been launched by catapult or RATO  
while the boat was on the surface.

>>  The short, cynical answer to the great one-missile question, which
has chewed
>>  up Mb upon Mb in such forums as the UFO mailing list, is that, that
way, the
					^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Oh  my	god  .

>>  more control over the budget, and you can _really_ appreciate the
Moonbase
>>  gals this time around. 

Well, there is that... <g>

>>  Not to mention Ayshea...

?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
|  john_medway@zycor.lgc.com  |  Landmark Graphics Corp  |  512.292.2325
 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
|		 "I am not a user. I am a human being." 		
 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---