RE: TV SF's glorious past ;-)
From: jjm@z... (johnjmedway)
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 06:28:18 -0400
Subject: RE: TV SF's glorious past ;-)
>> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 10:24:18 +0000
>> From: Phillip Atcliffe <P-ATCLIFFE@wpg.uwe.ac.uk>
>> Subject: RE: TV SF's glorious past ;-) - Reply
...
>> equipment from Monday's episode) are still very much theory.
Actually, the
>> sub-launched fighter is the most feasible piece of equipment of the
lot, with the
>> possible exception of the Mobiles. There have been sub-launched
aircraft since
>> World War I! They just haven't been mounted on the front of the sub
up till now...
Sub-launched aircraft have been launched by catapult or RATO
while the boat was on the surface.
>> The short, cynical answer to the great one-missile question, which
has chewed
>> up Mb upon Mb in such forums as the UFO mailing list, is that, that
way, the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Oh my god .
>> more control over the budget, and you can _really_ appreciate the
Moonbase
>> gals this time around.
Well, there is that... <g>
>> Not to mention Ayshea...
?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
| john_medway@zycor.lgc.com | Landmark Graphics Corp | 512.292.2325
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
| "I am not a user. I am a human being."
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---