Re: Those annoying aliens...
From: Ian Dunn <idunn@n...>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 10:25:58 +1000
Subject: Re: Those annoying aliens...
On Tue, 25 Jun 1996, Oerjan Ohlson wrote:
> Well... either you water them down by changing the rules for them, or
you
> water them down by increasing the points cost for them - if you want
to
> use the points system at all, of course. Using them as they stand,
> without changing either, is IMO serious gamesmanship on the Kra'Vak
side
> if you insist on playing roughly equal cost battles (and, since most
> around here are brought up with GW, that's pretty common...)
Yes i can see that GW could engender a culture of equal points based
battles. But FT is not a GW product, and in a way is in rebellion
against
that kind of thinking.
Our club is based in WRG ancients (again an equal points battle culture)
and we did have a campaign where the Kra'Vak shredded the NSL fleet that
i
was part of. But also in WRG games we developed a lot of scenario games
and campaigns where you have to fight with unbalenced forces.
And its not to hard to limit Kra'Vak forces to 1/3 of human forces for a
fairer game. I can understand that a GW player would see Kra'Vak as a
cheesy 'army' and just play it to the limit. Personally the only GW game
i
play is Necromunda otherwise im playing WRG DBM or DBR games.
Im not sure what to do with oafs who play gamesmanship, besides beating
them around the ears a bit. I mean it you ever get out here, i'll give
you
a friendly game as long as i get to play Sa'Vasku :)
Cheers
Ian
*****************************************************************
_________________
T T T T T T T T Ian Dunn
I I I I I I I I I.Dunn@nla.gov.au
I I I I I I I I National Library of Australia
T T T T T T T T Phone: +616 2621467
=================== Fax: +616 2731180
*****************************************************************