GZG List archives -- May 2008

Number 11 of 501 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] Multi-level rules sought. [TOBECLASSIFIED] [SEC=PERSONAL]



Plus the fact it makes external maintenance on said small craft a lot more
difficult.  And if your shuttles also have hardpoints, reloading becomes
a real pain.

JGH

emu2020@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Only problem I can see with this is that you are exposing your secondary 
> craft to damage by the elements (yes, elements in space) as well as 
> damage from combat. I mean a lot of this comes down to design philosophy 
> and how you want to arrange things. Sure, modern surface vessles keep 
> their lifeboat on deck, but they are also kept safe from the elements 
> and out of harms way. On top of this ending up in the ocean without a 
> boat may be deadly, but ending up in space without a boat is death itself.
>  
> -Eli
>  
> 
>     -------------- Original message --------------
>     From: "Robyn Stott" <rodstott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
>      > I can also see the standard compliment of shuttles on board a
>     ship to be
>      > externally docked not taking up any really internal space.
>      > There is just a airlock hatch, and you are in the shuttle.
>      > The shuttle is attached by clamps to the ship, and allows for
>     easy undocking
>      > but docking requires some maneuverability, and may not be
>     possible under
>      > combat conditions.
>      >
>      > These shuttle ports could also be where umbilicials, and ship
>     docking
>      > couplers could also attach.
>      > Something like a personal transfer pod, or utility shuttle
>     reqally doesn't
>      > need a docking bay, just a space on the hull and an airlock.
>      >
>      > With fittings like this, they could also easily act as escape
>     pods/craft as
>      > wel l since no bay is required.
>      >
>      > In streamlined designs the shuttles could be in recessed bays on
>     the outside
>      > of the hull, only enough space to hold the shuttle and some
>     umbilical
>      > connectors. Bays like these are not meant to be servicable and
>     docking would
>      > be harder. - Another possibility is custom designed shuttlecraft
>     that match
>      > the streamlining and can sit esternally or partially recessed,
>     their form
>      > merging with the outer streamlined hull of the ship itself.
>      >
>      > Robyn Stott
>      >
>      >
>      > _______________________________________________
>      > Gzg-l mailing list
>      > Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>      >
>     http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


-- 
** Jerry Han - jhan@xxxxxxxxxxxx - http://www.warpfish.com/jhan - TBFTGOGGI **
  "When the day goes down on the Water town; when the sun sinks low all around
    That's when I know I need you now; You're what I miss, every little kiss"
                            -- Bruce Hornsby and the Range, "Every Little Kiss"

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l



  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] FTverse colinies
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Multi-level rules sought. [TBC] [SEC=P] & FTverse colinies

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] Multi-level rules sought. [TOBECLASSIFIED] [SEC=PERSONAL]
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] Multi-level rules sought. [TBC] [SEC=P] & FTverse colinies

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Sun Jun 01 01:07:26 GMT 2008