GZG List archives -- April 2008

Number 282 of 297 messages in this Archive
[Date Prev] Main Index [Date Next]
[Thread Prev] Thread Index [Thread Next]

Re: [GZG] Multi-level rules sought.





On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Robert Mayberry <robert.mayberry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]

Another thing in FT would to make fighters slightly less disposable
than they are now. I know that revisiting fighters is a priority for
the playtest crew, so I imagine we'll see stuff there. Whatever
happens, it's hard to put a player-character pilot into a game (even
an Ace) when he dies more often than a character in Paranoia.

Just a brain-wrapping note, you can always PSB it that fighter kills are not necessarily outright destruction of the fighter and death of the pilot, but more of a 'combat kill', rendering the fighter no longer capable of combat and returns to its base ship if possible. So the pilot survives, just isn't able to finish the fight this time around. There are ways to represent this in actual game play if you want to track 'combat kills' and 'actual destructions', but it makes life a lot more complicated.

Mk
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


  • Prev by Date: Re: [GZG] Multi-level rules sought.
  • Next by Date: Re: [GZG] Multi-level rules sought.

  • Previous by thread: Re: [GZG] Multi-level rules sought.
  • Next by thread: Re: [GZG] Multi-level rules sought.

  • Main Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Archive Index

    roger@nospam.firedrake.org
    Generated: Thu May 01 01:07:20 GMT 2008