Re: [GZG] LITE, LIGHT and other painful matters

["Michael" <mwsaber6@xxxxxxx>]

We have a copy of the OED, you DON'T want to get hit with it!

 

 

 

 

Michael Brown
mwsaber6@msn

From: Evyn MacDude

Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 3:33 PM

To: gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: [GZG] LITE, LIGHT and other painful matters

On  Apr17 08, at 13:05, Tom B wrote:

LITE - makes my eyes bleed
LIGHT - looks right and proper, even if the gh should be pronounced like a cat throwing up in a proper language (and this should be 'licht')

As there is no Academy of the English language, lite is correct if it's meaning is clear, and if

y'all want to argue I have access to an OED and am willing to smack said objecting nits

upside the head with said collection. 

Now this entire conversation would be a great scenario the NAS civil war, all over spelling.

Note, I am american who learned to speak from a Cockney Nanny, lives in California, and

has dated and/or lived with an Australian. Thus it's all bloody english to me. 

Evyn MacDude

infojunky@xxxxxxxxxx

"When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed"

---

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l